Last night I engaged in the futile, barely entertaining practice of watching the first Presidential debate. I got through the whole painful thing with the help of some Ghirardelli and cheap beer, but we didn't learn anything new, no minds were changed, and I logged into Facebook afterwards with a sinking feeling in my stomach. Sure enough, there was the obligatory tsunami of partisan memes, "fact checks," stilted commentary, and general dysfunctional chaos. *sigh*
It frequently feels
like we’ve reached peak political madness, with two of the most despised presidential candidates in recent memory, tons of private money pouring into our
elections, the worst political polarization we've seen in decades, racial tension erupting, political scandals, banking scandals,
violent attacks, and the media feasting on it all like a dog wolfing down a
rotisserie chicken.
So, on the theme of debates in general, I'd like to offer my 5 rules for behaving like an adult while discussing complicated stuff. Feel free to share! Civilizing the Internet may be a lost cause, but Borges wrote that "only lost causes should be attractive." Therefore, without further preamble, as a concerned citizen, sometime Internet user, and a
politically-minded human being, I would like to offer this as my personal guide
to being a Responsible Participant in the National Dialogue.
A Guide to Talking About Complicated Stuff
(Or, 5 Handy Tips for Not Being an Insufferable Ignoramus
This Election Season)
1. Shut the Fuck Up
For
God’s sake, stop contributing to the meaningless noise.
Hollering that you support gun
control doesn’t do a damn thing. Posting cartoonish memes of politicians
looking dumb with some reductive, tragically biased, out-of-context phrase
stamped over their face doesn’t do a damn thing. What are you trying to prove?
That you’re more obnoxious than anyone else on Facebook? Because it’s working.
If you want everyone to know you’re
in support of 2nd amendment rights, then write something about why
you support open carry, or whose policies you agree with and why. If you want
to let your liberal flag fly, write a thoughtful post on the Democratic Party
platform. Don’t junk up everyone’s feeds with more senseless vaguely political white
noise.
I know: reposting these things is a
quick, easy way to convey where you stand on an issue and connect with friends
who agree. But this isn’t the time or place for these kinds of “atta-boy”
affirmations. In a country struggling with a breakdown of dialogue and
increasing polarization, we don’t need to be reinforcing this kind of
simplistic, tribal reasoning. Trying to reduce an entire issue or candidate to
the size of an Instagram post is about as ridiculous as trying to draw an
accurate representation of the solar system with a 4-pack of Crayolas.
If you want to junk up my feed, post pictures of baby otters. Or your daughter’s latest crafting project. Or pasta recipes.
If you’re looking for affirmation,
take it offline.
2. Do your Fucking Homework
In three parts!
Part 1: Fact check
your memes, people. Seriously. I swear to God, if I see one more meme saying
that Clinton is going to take away all our guns I’m going to scream. You’ve heard
it a million times before, and I’ll repeat it again here, because apparently it
hasn’t stuck yet: Just because it’s online, does NOT make it remotely true.
Even if it agrees with your ideology and looks semi-legit. Maybe especially if
it checks those two boxes. This is one of Google’s highest callings – put it to
work. The beauty of the Internet is that these answers are usually just a few
clicks away, so you don’t typically even need to work that hard for it. You’ll
look smarter and you’ll be able to actually speak intelligently about the
things you wind up talking about.
Part 2: If you post something and
then find out it’s inaccurate or untrue, take the damned thing down. Delete
the post. There’s enough junk on the Internet that we don’t need gratuitous
garbage information floating around perpetuating itself through infinite
reposts.
And, finally, Part 3: be an accuracy
cop. If you know your shit (I’m talking real policy, people, not partisan
bullshit), and you see your friends and family perpetuating the false or partisan bullshit,
call them on it. Be civil, be kind, don’t be an ass, but let’s be each other’s
keepers.
Friends don’t let friends post
stupid shit.
3. Argue Like a Grown-Up
Can we please all accept that using
the “so-and-so is DUMB!” hasn’t been an effective way to win an argument since
we were 6 years old? Our country is at a crossroads, and we still have
throngs of otherwise responsible adults who fling around insults as a way of attempting to interact
intelligently.
“Only idiots believe…” is a great
way to alienate a bunch of people, particularly since it’s generally not true.
“You’re stupid!” or “what an idiot!” are great phrases if you’re writing a
comedy sketch, but have no place in discussions of real consequence. Absurd,
condescending language like “moron,” “Drumph,” “Killary,” “lunatic,” and the
spectacularly dysfunctional term “librtard” just manage to make you look like a flailing, reactionary neanderthal who's in over your head.
Don’t call anyone a moron because
of what they believe. Instead, make a real
point about why you think what you do.
When in doubt, think back to your
debate teacher. Would your debate teacher approve of how you’re approaching
this? Then it probably won’t do any good. Reconsider. If you didn’t take
debate, use this nifty rule of thumb: the first person to insult, degrade, or
otherwise attack their opponent’s character loses the debate instantly.
Take the high road. The view is
better from up there.
4. Accept that You Are Both Wrong and Ignorant. Yes, You.
Are you a Supreme Court Justice?
Are you a Senator? The President, maybe? Maybe just a Governor? No? Didn’t think so.
So don’t act like you know
everything there is to know about the law, the constitution, or interpreting
said documents. Because you don’t. I don’t, either. I’m necessarily wrong about
a lot of things, because I haven’t made it my life’s work to understand them.
However, there are people –
brilliant, thoughtful, well-intentioned people – who have made it their life’s work to understand these things, and
they’ve come to some pretty radically different conclusions. Justice Scalia,
may he rest in peace, disagreed with me on a shit-ton of issues. And you know
what? He was way better informed than I am to make those calls. You may
disagree with Ruth Bader Ginsberg on everything under the sun, but she’s far,
far better qualified than you to be making those decisions. That’s why she’s on
the Supreme Court and you and I get into flame wars on Facebook.
Can we please all accept that we’re
not right about everything? That we are, in fact, probably wrong about most
things? That vastly different interpretations are valid, important, and
contribute to this wonderful, evolving, living Democracy of ours? There has
always been tension between progressive and conservative values, which is right
and good. The real work of Democracy happens in the constructive wrangling
between the two. (Emphasis on constructive.) Democracy doesn’t work when there’s a runaway victory of
either ideology, and it doesn’t work when there’s a deadlock between the two. I
daresay either scenario would eventually look pretty ugly for everyone after a
while.
5. Fuck the Echo Chamber
One of the amazing things the
Internet does is that it makes it really easy to find like-minded people to
connect with. We may have a few token friends from across the aisle, but you
can truly spend your entire life looking at comfortable, affirming newsfeeds
that reassure you that your candidate is right, the other side is the enemy,
and you should really pat yourself on the back for being so enlightened. Your
friend posts things that make you feel oogey? Unfollow them! They don’t ever
need to know, and you don’t ever have to see their icky opinionated socialist/gun rights/third-party candidate/race relations babble.
We listen to conservative/liberal
talk radio, we read conservative/liberal news outlets, we talk to our conservative/liberal
friends. Our conservative/liberal families reinforce our ideas and ideals, and we
live, breathe, and move in a world where it is assumed that we will be good
conservative/liberal soldiers.
These echo chambers we create for
ourselves have the effect of reinforcing themselves over time. The longer we
spend in them, the more information we have to support our previously
formulated views, and the more validation we receive from the people who agree
with us. This is terribly, terribly dangerous. We run the risk of becoming
reasonably well-informed but radically different and fundamentally opposed species;
speaking on the same issues, referencing the same source documents, but with no
frame of reference to connect with or understand each other, and no incentive
or impulse to make a real effort.
Please, please, don’t fall into
this trap. Make some friends who disagree with you on important things, and
then make a monthly lunch date to talk about those things. Dare to talk about politics at family gatherings. Listen to real,
substantive commentary that you disagree with, and really try to connect with
the people and motivations behind them. No one wakes up in the morning thinking
“ah! Another lovely day to spread chaos and undermine Democracy!” Start by
assuming that the people who make you uncomfortable have reasons, probably good reasons, for believing what they
do, and then work backwards from there.
This whole Democracy thing doesn’t work if we lose sight
of each other as human beings, and it doesn’t work if we stop listening to each
other.
I look across the aisle, and I see people who are every bit as concerned about the direction and the welfare of this country as I am, but somehow we've managed to wind up speaking entirely different languages. We hurl catchy slogans and verbal feces at each other, hoping that something will stick, and wondering how this disastrous dumpster fire of an election could possibly have happened on our watch. I can't answer that. I'm just as baffled and dismayed as anyone else. But I think we could stand to return some civility and thoughtfulness to our national dialogue. That might help start the conversation.
Here's some chocolate to help.
Item: Dark Chocolate Spicy Caramel
Percentage: ???
Made By: Ghirardelli
Made In: San Leandro, CA
Price: $16.95 for 33 squares (I got the smaller bag, but I can't find my receipt)
Review: Ghirardelli is a giant, soulless chocolate conglomerate, befitting a celebration of the giant, soulless political machine. A member of the Lindt family of businesses, Ghirardelli has been making chocolate in the California Bay Area for more than 160 years, and was the first major chocolate producer to popularize putting the cacao percentage on the packaging. They are one of the better giant, soulless chocolate conglomerates, but that doesn't make them "serious" chocolate - their "dark" chocolate reads a lot like good milk chocolate, really (maybe 60-ish%?), and the vast amount of production mean that the chocolate has very little in the way of character. The Spicy Caramel flavor is a new one in their classic filled squares line - honestly, the flavor profile reminds me a lot of the Chili Nut M&Ms from this spring, just with somewhat better chocolate and without the peanut in the middle. The caramel is in a nice, oozy, creamy center, surrounded by a crisp chocolate shell, and chances are you'll find one or two of the squares in your bag have sprung a leak and lost some of their filling, but fortunately there's no shame in licking it off the foil wrapper. The "natural chili pepper flavor" is interesting - it doesn't really *taste* like anything, it's just kind of *there,* so the spicy adds some interest, but not much character. Still, it manages to cut the sweetness of the caramel nicely, and it's a fun, somewhat unusual flavor combination. Overall, I'm glad I got them.
RECOMMEND, WITH CRAPPY BEER AND A SIDE OF OBNOXIOUS PARTISAN BULLSHIT
With love,
- K